Blogger #18:
"I've
been brought up over the last few years believing this was the golden
generation. If this is the golden generation, the sooner we move away from the
gold standard the better." - Lord Mawhinney, Football League Chairman in 2007.
After a
decade of hype, expectations and hopes going down the drain, it’s at last common
knowledge. England’s so-called ‘golden generation’ has passed its prime. Players
like Gerrard, Rooney, and Lampard have repeatedly raised hopes with their
excellent performances for their clubs only to disappoint in an England shirt. But
amidst all the doom and gloom and shootout heartbreaks, Ashley Cole has always
stood tall.
Only the
seventh player to win 100 caps for England, he has been a consistent and
reliable performer, is still considered as one of the best left backs in the
world, and arguably the only member of the ‘golden generation’ to truly live up
to his potential in an England shirt. When you consider the fact that next to
nobody likes him (well, John Terry maybe) you have to admit it’s for his
prowess and ability on the field alone. His performance against Ronaldo at Euro
2004 was probably one of the best defensive displays from an Englishman.
But his
injury for Friday’s qualifier against Montenegro has thrown up an interesting
debate. Baines will, no doubt, replace Cole at left back, and will be looking
to impress and press his claims for a spot on the first team. But in all
honesty, Cole will slot back straight away once he recovers from his injury. An
immensely likeable player, Baines has excelled over the past two seasons for
Everton but has hardly featured for England. Much like Carragher before him, competing
with Terry and Ferdinand for the center back spot, Baines has been terribly
unlucky to have Cole to compete with.
Like we
all believe, Baines is the more likable guy, but Cole’s different class. Right?
Maybe
not.
Let
alone the world, Cole might not even be the best left back in the England
squad. And that is exactly what we’re going to try and investigate. And we’re
not going to stop with comparing just Baines and Cole. We’re going to throw in a
member of England’s future, Gibbs, and see whether he lives up to #14’s hype or
if he’s another Cleverley in the making. (Who needs Wesley, when we’ve got
Cleverley. Remember?)
Defending:
Baines | Gibbs | Cole | |
---|---|---|---|
Time/Mistake | 171 | 123.6 | 111.6 |
Time/Dribbled Past | 155.5 | 95.5 | 126.8 |
Time/Tackle | 37.2 | 27.7 | 43.6 |
Time/Clearance | 45 | 26.6 | 33.2 |
Time/Interception | 60 | 32.8 | 73.4 |
% of Aerial Duels Won | 39.2 | 44.44 | 52.5 |
% of Tackles won | 79 | 74 | 73 |
Cole has
built his reputation on hassling and dominating anyone in his zone and his
ability in the air shines through winning more than 50% of his aerial duels.
While Gibbs does a decent job too, winning almost 45% of his battle in the air,
Baines’ ability in the air shows a lot to be desired.
But the
most striking revelation is in the ‘dribbled past’ category. Baines is the more
reliable when taking on opposing wingers, being dribbled past every 155 minutes
compared to Cole’s 126. Baines also wins a mammoth 79% of his tackles. While
Gibbs stands his ground in the tackling department (winning 74%of his tackles
to Cole’s 73%), opposition wingers leave him standing every 95 minutes, way
behind his peers.
Surprisingly,
Cole is least active in the tackling department, with Gibbs way ahead. While
you could be excused for thinking that this could be attributed to Chelsea’s
possession play meaning Cole had less defensive work to do, that’s rendered
useless when you consider who Gibbs plays for. Also, Everton match Chelsea as
far as average possession is concerned (52%), so no excuses there. Another
popular and fair notion is that tackles are not the best way to measure a
defender’s skills because it means that the defender wasn’t in the right
position in the first place. An interception, on the other hand, shows one’s
ability to read the game. Again, Gibbs gives good reason for our very own
Arsenal fan (#14) to cry with joy making an interception every 33 minutes while
Cole is again made to looks like a bystander with one every 73 minutes. Baines quietly
slots between them in both tackles and interceptions with a tackle every 37 and
interception every 60 minutes.
Although
these stats have made Cole looks quite ordinary, one can also assume they point
out to Chelsea’s midfield prowess. A strong and impregnable midfield doing much
of the defensive work for the team leaving Cole with little to do. But when you
consider that Arsenal (who aren’t exactly famed for the defensive qualities of their
midfield) Everton and Chelsea almost match each other in the number of goals
conceded (40, 39 and 37) our assumption starts posing a huge question mark over
Chelsea’s defence. Cole’s inactivity might also mean a porous backline whose vulnerability
is exposed quite frequently whenever an attack bypasses their midfield wall.
While it
is of paramount importance to make crucial tackles and interceptions to cut out
an attack, defenders are also being increasingly judged on their ability to
stay calm under pressure and avoid mistakes. Looking at the number of mistakes
done by each player (loss of possession due to a mistake/poor control), Baines
again emerges as the most reliable. The numbers tell us that Cole makes errors
more often than Baines does, and while Gibbs can take comfort from the fact
that he isn’t the worst offender, he is a lot closer to Cole than he is to Baines.
The
picture we’ve painted so far shows Baines to be a reliable, if not spectacular,
defender. His forays forward often deflect attention from his defensive
abilities and while these numbers don’t exactly shout out for his inclusion in
the main team, they certainly show us that England won’t be weakened with him.
Gibbs is perfectly shown as a young, talented and possibly rash defender, his
energy clearly there for all to see, but he seems to be susceptible one-on-one,
something he’ll have to work on.
But
going forward? Just one winner.
Passing and Attacking:
Baines | Gibbs | Cole | |
---|---|---|---|
Goals | 5 | 0 | 1 |
Assists | 5 | 3 | 2 |
Time/Keypass | 29.5 | 67.8 | 155 |
Pass Accuracy (%) | 83 | 84 | 89 |
Cross Accuracy (%) | 30 | 17.7 | 9.6 |
Time/Dribble | 114 | 191.1 | 214.6 |
Time/Dispossesed | 101 | 162 | 116.25 |
Time/Fouled | 59 | 191 | 126.8 |
All
three are full-backs who love going forward, although permitted to do so at
different levels by their respective clubs. England largely rely on overlaps,
and in the absence of a world-class left winger in Hodgson’s 4-4-2, all three
would do well.
But this
is where Baines is in a class of his own. His attacking stats are something
akin to that of a winger and his value to this Everton team is evident for all
to see with him playing a key pass (a pass that leads to a shot on goal) every
29 minutes. Compared to that, Gibbs’ contribution at a key pass every 68
minutes looks laughable, and yet looks impressive when you bring Cole’s
contribution (155 min/key pass) into perspective. Of course, Baines was the
focal point of a majority of Everton’s attacks last season, but even then, 3
chances created every game looks mighty impressive when you see that Cole
creates one every game and three quarters.
Interesting
snippet - Last season, Baines created the most chances in not just England, but
Europe. That includes midfielders, strikers ET al. That’s more chances created
than the likes of Ozil, Cazorla, Sniejder and Iniesta. And he’s a left back.
But Cole
shows his reliability completing 89% of his passes. While it’s not a huge jump
over Baines’ 83% and Gibbs’ 84%, for an England side that regularly struggles
to keep hold of the ball it could prove crucial. Baines is also dispossessed (being
tackled by an opponent) more often than the other two. Gibbs’ ability on the
ball, honed in his days as a winger, shines through with opponents struggling
to get the ball off him (once every 166 minutes).
But, Baines
plays a much more important role for his side in the attacking third. This
could explain his reduced accuracies as he would be closed down more often,
attempting intricate passes in a much more crowded zone of the pitch aimed
towards areas with a higher number of opposition players.
Baines
also shows why he could be included in the side even when Cole returns. As a
left winger.
At home
when attacking down the flanks, he dribbles successfully almost twice as often
as Cole. His crossing skills are also obviously superior to the other two, more
so to Cole, Baines being thrice as accurate as Cole. Of course, much of Baines’
crosses will have been aimed at the likes of Fellaini, while Cole had to deal
with Fernando Torres. Again, Gibbs makes a case for his own inclusion over
Cole, bettering him in both dribbling and crossing abilities.
Interestingly,
Baines also draws the most number of fouls from opponents (once every 59
minutes). Ironically, it is for his ability on the ball that they hack him down
but inevitably provide him with an opportunity to flex his set-piece abilities,
leading us to his most famed talent.
Not
since Beckham’s retirement have England possessed a more potent crosser and free
kick taker. In games where they struggle to break down the opposition, which
quite frankly happens a lot, Baines could make the difference. 10-3 over both
Gibbs and Cole on the goals and assist tally is a telling statistic.
Final Thoughts:
By no
means am I trying to doubt Cole’s abilities as a footballer. The numbers may
not paint him in favourable light, but as it’s often said, stats hide a lot
more than they reveal. His contributions cannot be ignored and he will probably
be the only English player in the last 5 years to make it into a World XI. His
experience and guile when defending against top opposition who will take the
game to England will surely prove crucial if and when England qualify for
Brazil 2014.
Gibbs
has shown that he has the ability to ply his trade amongst the English elite.
Reliable and ever-active in defense, he seems to be a younger version of A.Cole
himself. While he may not possess the attacking abilities of Baines, he has
shown that he can more than take care of himself in the final third. He’s got
age on his side, and if he could work on his defensive abilities one v one, it
might not be long before he permanently features in the England line-up.
But,
given his truly inspired play over the last two years, leaving Baines on the
bench would be a colossal waste of talent. With leading attacking stats in not
just England, but Europe, his attacking abilities are unparalleled amongst
English defenders. Hugely underrated defensively, Baines is the way to go if
England are to move forward as a team.
Has baines played against the likes of bayern munichs & barcelonas? Cole is up for big games and that's why he is undisputed no.#1 in his position!
ReplyDeleteWe'll never know until we play him will we? And Baines has played against the local heavyweights like Man City, United, Arsenal, Chelsea, etc.
ReplyDeleteAs we said, not trying to doubt Cole's abilities here. But Baines certainly has more than him going forward and that is what England need to take advantage of. Probably not play him against the Spains and Germanys in the semi finals straight away, but surely can pick him over Cole against the smaller sides and see how he does?
There is every chance Baines might turn out to be one of those players who shine for their clubs for fail miserably for England, but we'll never know until we give him a good run in the side. And if we're going to wait until Cole retires, it might be too late.